Arindam Lodh, J.[1] Impugnment is the order dated 8th April, 2021, passed by learned Single Judge in WP(C) No.265 of 2021, whereby the writ petitioner being failed in her challenge against the imposition of minor penalty upon her by the Disciplinary Authority has preferred the pr...
[1] Heard Mr. P. Roy Barman, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. Samarjit Bhattacharjee, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Mr. Debalay Bhattacharya, learned Government Advocate assisted by Mr. Soumyadeep Saha, learned counsel appearing for the respondents-State. ...
[1] Heard learned counsel for the parties. [2] The appellant-State is aggrieved by the judgment dated 16.09.2021 passed in WP(C) No.330 of 2019 by the learned Single Judge whereby the writ petition was disposed of with the following directions: "(i) The pay of the petitioner sha...
[1] Heard learned counsel for the parties. [2] By the impugned judgment dated 30.11.2022, the learned Writ Court has allowed the prayer of the writ petitioner and in effect quashed the office memorandum dated 22.08.2022 issued by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Dharmanagar, North...
[1] Heard Mr. A.K Pal, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Mangal Debbarma, learned Additional Government Advocate for the Staterespondents. [2] The order impugned in the writ petition reads as under : "09."In view of the above and in pursuance of Rule-12(i)(a) of the TSCS...
Indrajit Mahanty, A.C.J.[1] This present appeal has been filed against the Judgment dated 23.08.2019 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Unakoti Judicial District, Kailasahar, in T.A. 21 of 2019, arising out of the Judgment dated 12.02.2019 passed by the learned Civi...
Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.[1] Heard Mr. A. De, learned counsel appearing for the appellantN.F. Railway. Also heard Mr. Sankar Bhattacharjee, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1-claimant. [2] This appeal under section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter r...
Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.[1] By filling this present writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for directing respondents No.1 to 4 to give the petitioner the benefit of stepping up of his pay and allowances at par with that of his juni...
Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.[1] The brief fact of this case is that the petitioner is a transport contractor. The petitioner participated in the tender process and deposited an Earnest Money Deposit (in short 'EMD') of Rs.5,83,800/-. But after the declaration of unsuccessful tender or...
T. Amarnath Goud[1] By means of this petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., the petitioner has prayed for directing the respondents to further investigate into West Agartala P.S. case No.066 of 2016 registered under Sections 406 /468/ 471/420 of IPC in accordance with law. ...