P.K. Rastogi, Member[1] This petition has been filed to direct the Respondent Company to supply its signals to the petitioner. [2] The Petitioner Company is a registered Cable television service Operator and has been running a Cable Television Network Operator business since 29....
[1] These five petitions involving common questions of law and fact were taken up for hearing together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. [2] Licenses for the circles of Haryana, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, Delhi, Punjab and Karnataka were granted in favour of t...
S.B. Sinha, J.[1] The petitioner is a Multi Service Operator (MSO); whereas the respondent is a broadcaster within the meaning of the provisions of the Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable Services) Interconnection Regulations, 2004 (the Regulation) having been producing a c...
[1] The petitioner is a licensee of the respondent herein; the license having been granted in terms of the proviso appended under Section 4 of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885. [2] This petition has been filed by the petitioner herein aggrieved by and dissatisfied with an order da...
[1] The petitioner is a producer of the channels Neo Cricket and Neo Sports. The respondent is a Multi Service Operator (MSO). [2] The parties hereto entered into a subscription agreement on or about 20.8.2008 for the period 5.3.2008 to 4.3.2009. In terms of the said agreement t...
[1] The petitioner no.1 is a Multi Service Operator (MSO) having a PAN India presence. [2] It was earlier known as `Siti Cable Network Ltd'. The parties hereto entered into an agreement on or about 26.9.1996 for obtaining supply of signals of the channels of which the petitioner...
P.K. Rastogi, Member[1] This petition has been filed by the petitioner for setting aside demand notices of the respondents dated 28th October 2010 and 12th November 2010 relating to a demand of Rs. 1,36,74,762/-containing an amount of Rs. 1,29,89,326/-; Rs. 3,11,950/- and Rs. 3,7...
S.B. Sinha, J.[1] The petitioner is a Multi Service Operator having its headend in the town ofYamuna Nagar. The parties hereto entered into an agreement for supply of signals of the respondent's channel on or about 21.05.2011. [2] According to the petitioner although initially i...
S. B. Sinha, J. [1] The petitioner herein is a Local Cable Operator. [2] The respondent is a broadcaster. In this petition, the petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction of this Tribunal for a direction upon the respondent to supply signals of its channels to its network. [3] The...
[1] The petitioner, who is a Multi Service Operator and admittedly operates in the CAS areas in the town of Calcutta, has filed this petition inter-alia for a direction upon the respondent to supply signals of its channels to its network. [2] The petitioner allegedly had been...