R.K. Anand, Member[1] We have heard the applicant, who is present in person, as well as the learned Advocate for the respondent. On the last date of hearing, we had given last and final opportunity to the respondent to refund the amount of Rs. 51,250/- (Rupees fifty one thousand ...
Moksh Mahajan, Member[1] The applicant is a public limited company engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling synthetic products. Respondent No. 1 - M/s. Master Road Lines, Delhi is a firm carrying on business of transporting goods for consideration. Respondent No. 2 (M...
Moksh Mahajan, Member[1] Director General (Investigation and Registration) (hereinafter referred to as DG) has filed an application under Sections 10(a)(iii) and 36B(c) of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as Act) alleging that the ...
R.L. Sudhir, Member[1] On a complaint received from Dilshad Plaza Residents Welfare Association alleging adoption of unfair trade practices by the respondent, namely, M/s. DLF Universal Ltd., the Director General (Investigation and Registration) (DG for short) was directed to enq...
C.M. Nayar, Chairman[1] The present proceedings arose out of a complaint filed by one Shri Rajendra Jain Nagda. A Notice of Enquiry was issued by the Commission by an order dated 24.5.20001 The Preliminary Investigation Report has been placed on record, The respondent is stated t...
C.M. Nayar, J.[1] The complainant, Mrs. Nandini Sarma applied and purchased three units of land in February 1996, at a total cost of Rs. 34,000/-. This was on the basis of an advertisement issued by M/s. KKR Palm Oil India Ltd. As per the representation in the advertisement, the ...
Moksh Mahajan, Member[1] The respondent is a public limited company having its registered office at Utran (District Surat), Gujarat. It is engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of distribution of newsprint, White Duplex Board, Grey Board, Tubing Chip Board, Unbleached B...
C.M. Nayar, J.[1] The present application has been filed under Section 12-B of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The brief facts of the case are the respondent Kanpur Development Authority announced a scheme for registr...
C.M. Nayar, J.[1] The present application has been filed under Section 12-B of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The brief facts of the case are the respondent Kanpur Development Authority announced a scheme for registr...
R.K. Anand, Member[1] Learned Advocate for the respondent states, under instructions at the Bar, that the impugned trade practice has since been discontinued, as the Licence Agreement between the respondent, Koshika Telecom Limited and the Union of India has been terminated vide ...