Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi[1] Heard Mr. B.M. Tripathi, learned senior counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Shreenu Garapati, learned S.C.-III for the State. [2] This petition has been filed for quashing of the order dated 23.12.2014, passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi, wh...
Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.[1] The instant writ petition is under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, wherein, the part of the award, by which, instead of reinstating the workmen in service with the consequential benefits, the compensation to the tune of Rs.12,000/- was awarde...
Deepak Roshan, J.[1] Heard learned counsel for the parties. [2] This criminal appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction dated 24.05.2004 and order of sentence dated 25.05.2004, passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-III, Gumla in Sessions Trial ...
Deepak Roshan, J.[1] T.A. 25 of 2019 has been preferred by the appellant Revenue praying therein for quashing of the order dated 15.03.2019 passed by the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT); whereby the learned ITAT has dismissed the appeal of the Revenue being ITA No. 1...
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.[1] Cr.M.P. No.1157 of 2013 1. Heard Mr. Manoj Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. S.K. Srivastava, learned counsel for the State and Mr. Rishi Chandan, learned counsel for opposite party no.2. [2] This petition has been filed for quashing of ...
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.[1] Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, learned counsel for the State and Mr. Ranjit Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for opposite party no.2. [2] This petition has been filed for quashing the entire criminal proceeding including the order dated 07.07.2012 passed in P.C.R. N...
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.[1] Heard Mr. Suraj Kishore Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. V.S. Sahay, learned counsel for the State. [2] This petition has been filed for quashing of the order dated 22.01.2011 passed in S.C. No.33 of 2010 by the learned Additional Di...
Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.[1] Heard the learned counsel for the parties. [2] This writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs: "(a) For the issuance of an appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions for quashing of the letter as contained in Memo No. 92...
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.[1] In both the petitions a common question of law and facts and order taking cognizance are involved and that is why both these petitions are heard together with consent of the parties. [2] These petitions have been filed for quashing of the entire crimi...
Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.[1] The instant appeal, filed under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has been preferred against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 20.02.2014 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Ghatshila in Sessions Case No...