04 Mar
2010

JHV CONSTRUCTION COMPANY PVT LTD V/S RAKESH KUMAR YADAV

[1] Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant. None appears for the respondent. It appears from the order dated 29th May, 2009 that the respondent was set ex-parte because of continued non-appearance. The prayers in the Compensation Application were for compensation on account ...

03 Mar
2010

PUNEET CO-COPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD AND ORS V/S ARCHANA MISHRA

[1] Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and the Vice President of the respondent's Group Housing Society. It appears from the order dated 20th June 2000 that the demand of ''Entry Fee'' is in violation of the directions issued by the Registrar Co-operative Societies, Delh...

15 Feb
2010

JINDAL STEEL AND POWER LTD V/S STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD

[1] This appeal has been filed under Section 53B of the Competition Act, 2002 (Act 12 of 2003) (the Act) questioning correctness of the direction as contained in order dated 8-12-2009 by the Competition Commission of India ('Commission') in Case No. 11 of 2009. The said direction...

15 Feb
2010

JINDAL STEEL AND POWER LIMITED V/S STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LIMITED

Appeal

[1] This appeal has been filed under Section 53B of the Competition Act, 2002 (Act 12 of 2003) (hereinafter referred to as the Act) questioning correctness of the direction as contained in order dated 8.12.2009 by the Competition Commission of India (in short the 'Commission') in...

18 Jan
2010

TAMIL NADU CHEMISTS, DRUGGISTS ASSOCIATION & ORS V/S TAMIL NADU PHARMACEUTICALS DISTRIBUTORS ASSN

[1] Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Though the matter was posted for the cross-examination of the complainant's witness, we find that the order dated 02.09.2005 disposing of the application under Section 12-A of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 ...

18 Jan
2010

SUPER CASSETTES INDUSTRIES V/S DIRECTOR GENERAL

[1] Having heard the representative of the DG (I&R) and the learned counsel for the respondent, we find that on the admitted facts of the case, the information indicated in the Inlay Card was that it was version recording. That being so, prima facie, no case for enquiry is made o...

07 Jan
2010

NEW INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD AND ANR V/S DG

[1] Heard. The grievance made by the complainant which was espoused by the DG (I&R) was that there was a cartelization because the four Insurance Companies which were under the umbrella of the GIC agreed to charge identical sum as premium per person. Mere fact that the four Insur...

05 Jan
2010

REEBOK INDIA COMPANY V/S D G (I&R)

[1] By order dated 24th March, 2006 the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission (in short Commission) passed an order on the application filed by the D.G.(I&R) under Section 10(a)(iii) of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (in short the Act) wh...

05 Jan
2010

STERING HOLIDAY RESORTS V/S PRAMOD KISHAN KHANNA

Arijit Pasayat, J.[1] We have heard counsel for the complainant. Perused the order dated 18th February, 2009 passed by Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission (in short the Commission). In paragraph 15 of the Order passed it has been directed as follows: The respond...

05 Jan
2010

HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORP LTD AND ORS V/S D G

[1] Heard the representative of the D.G. (I&R). We have gone through the Preliminary Investigation Report. The reply of the respondent clearly indicates that they have prominently displayed in the show-rooms indicating ''While you are welcome to purchase a stove/cooking range fro...