11 Nov
2009

BSES YAMUNA POWER LTD V/S MOHD JAIDI

[1] Heard the learned Counsel for the complainant. [2] The dispute in question which is primarily sought to be decided between the parties relates to the alleged excessive billing by the respondent BSES Yamuna Power Limited in respect of the electricity consumed by the complaina...

11 Nov
2009

ARMY WELFARE HOUSING ORGANIZATION V/S S R SAINI

Arijit Pasayat, J.[1] The Contempt proceedings were adjourned sine die as the matter was pending before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. By orders dated 10th September 2008, 7th January 2009 and 8th April 2009, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission, (in short the ''...

11 Nov
2009

G D A V/S OM PRAKASH

[1] None appears for the petitioner. The respondent is also not represented. This is an application for review of the order dated 30th September 2005. In para 8 of the order the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission (in short the ''Commission'') observed as follow...

09 Nov
2009

GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S MAHENDER KUMAR

[1] It is stated that though a contempt petition was filed, the same is not pressed. The same is dismissed accordingly. Compensation Application(CA No. 44/2007) This is a compensation application filed Under Section 12B of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 ...

06 Nov
2009

UNIKOL BOTTLER LTD AND ANR V/S DIRECTOR GENERAL, KAMLA RASTOGI AND ANR

[1] We have heard Mr. Makheeja, counsel for the DG. None appears for the respondent. The issue involved in this case is of a very small nature. Undisputedly, respondent No. 1 had appointed the complainant as their distributor. The deposit of money as claimed by the complainant is...

05 Nov
2009

BAL BHARTI PUBLIC SCHOOL V/S DIRECTOR GENERAL

Arijit Pasayat, J.[1] Heard the learned Counsel for the DG (I&R) and the counsel for the respondent. The controversy lies within a very narrow compass. The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission (in short ''the Commission'') directed preliminary investigation into ...

05 Nov
2009

EMAMI LTD V/S JOHNSON AND JOHNSON LTD

[1] We have heard Mr. Ashok H. Desai, the learned counsel for the complainant and Mr. Dushyant Dave for the respondent. [2] According to complainant, some of the advertisements issued by the respondents are misleading and in a way disparaging statements have been made qua the co...

04 Nov
2009

MAHARASTHRA STATE CHEMIST, DRUGGIST ASSOCIATION V/S JOHNSON & JOHNSON

Arijit Pasayat, J.[1] This application was filed by M/s. Johnson & Johnson Limited (hereinafter referred to as the complainant) before the Monopolies & Restrictive Trade Practices Commission (in short the ''Commission'') in the year 2002. By order dated 29th January, 2002 the Com...

04 Nov
2009

PERFETTI (I) LTD V/S D G (I AND R)

[1] On the basis of an application purported to be under Section 10(a)(iv)/36(B)(d) read with Sections 2(o), 2(o)(i), 2(o)(ii), 33(1)(j), 33(1)(e), 33(1)(c), 36A, 36(1)(iv)(vi)(x), 36A(3)(b) of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (in short the 'Act') the proc...