Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad, J.[1] Heard Sri B. Adinarayana Rao, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Javvaji Sarath Chandra, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Sri V. Maheswara Reddy, learned Government Pleader for Home and General Administration Departm...
V Sujatha, J.[1] The Writ Petition No.13821 of 2023 came to be filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:- "...to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action o...
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda, J.[1] This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, questioning the action of the respondents, claiming the relief to extend the benefit of enhancement of age of superannuation from 60 to 62 years; send proposals to the high...
T Mallikarjuna Rao, J.[1] The Appeal, under Section 96 of the Code of the Civil Procedure, is filed by the appellant/defendant challenging the decree and Judgment dated 04.03.2009 in O.S. No.147 of 2004 passed by the learned V Additional Senior Civil Judge, Guntur (for short, 'tr...
T.Mallikarjuna Rao, J.[1] The Appeal, under Section 96 of the of the Code of the Civil Procedure, is filed by the appellant/2nd defendant challenging the decree and judgment dt.30.11.2012 in O.S.No.117 of 2004 passed by the XI Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court, Guntur a...
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda, J.[1] All these writ petitions are filed questioning the action of the respondents, claiming the relief to extend the benefit of enhancement of age of superannuation from 60 to 62 years; send proposals to the higher authorities for enhancing the service ...
D.V.S.S.Somayajulu, J.[1] This Court has heard Smt.B.Vasantha Lakshmi, learned counsel for the appellant and learned senior counsel Sri M.Vijay Kumar representing the respondents. [2] The appellant is the Telangana Pollution Control Board. At the outset, learned counsel for the ...
D.V.S.S.Somayajulu, J.[1] This Writ Petition is filed by the petitioners questioning the order passed by the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada, in Crl.M.P.No.384 of 2022 in C.F.No.837 of 2022 appointing an Advocate Commissioner to take possession of the house bear...
B Krishna Mohan, J.[1] In all these cases the common issue is involved and as such the following common order is passed. But for the said purpose, the facts in W.P.No. 13995 of 2022 are taken up as under: [2] This writ petition is filed questioning the award No. 22 of 2018 passe...
V Gopala Krishna Rao, J.[1] The appellants are the Claimants in M.V.O.P.No.164 of 2011 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal -cum- I Additional District Judge, Ongole and the respondents are the respondents in the said case. [2] For the sake of convenience, both the ...